#OCL4Ed
My head was swimming with new information when I got to the
case study and I got lots of questions wrong the first time through. The process of learning i.ee being able
to open all the options as I went and think through the responses given was a positive one.
Some of the questions posed, that
resulted in a ‘depends’ style a frustrated me. They were framed as correct or incorrect questions, but
aside from that it was a good formative assessment process. I found that when I went back to the case
study questions a few hours later, having done some reflection and discussion
with others, I got most of them right. (this may, of course be because I simply
remembered the correct answers ??)
The case study question covered lots of relevant access/use
issues educators face on a daily basis.
I have discovered how
little I know about copyright and licensing and was able to identify and confront lots of the myths I held
regarding both. It appears complicated because it’s new ( jargon and
terminology) however once the concepts are understood I think I can identify
some of the underlying questions and issues, especially the ethical ones of
ownership, access, rights etc which emerged in a healthy debate in the office
today.
One of the new learnings was regarding the use of images,
photos etc. I hadn’t thought about who
owns the rights and at what point, and I still find it intriguing. The ethical issues of justice vs law emerged in our office debate.
So the case study was great, well thought out with lots of
complexity. Loved the fact that I could redo the questions to confirm my
improved understanding.